|
Visual Studio 2010 Professional Upgrade |
Visual Studio 2010 Professional Upgrade
I installed the product on a Win 7 64 bit scheme and it works great. Anyone with prior Visual Studio experience will no doubt be very happy with its
Visual Studio just keeps getting better with 2010 – even seems to load more quickly than my old 2005 model. Much cleaner navigation and work area. Installed very without evident effort on Windows XP – no difficultnesses at all.
I use a P5 Duo Processor 2.2GHz with 4GB RAM and an upgraded video card, which was fine for VS2008. With VS2010, I spend a big share of my time looking at the blue donut trying to remember why I purchased it in the firstborn place. I trippled my virual memory, discontinued as numerous processes and services as was reasonable, and monitor my Vista performance gauges to see where the bottleneck is. The CPU bounces between 6% and 100%, staying at 100% way too long, much too often. Apparently, it’s the x86 surroundings that is giving me the blue donut because the RAM never goes over 50% usage and spends most time not visibly utilized at all. However, the hard disk use has skyrocketed as VISTA pages to it to cashe the overloaded CPU. (explaining the blue donut)
Personally, I don’t want to purchase a new computer to use software when I’ve yet to perceive why a new machine is justified (aka: how an individual like me, who isn’t a tech writer, can increase their income), SP1 is already out on this software and reviews are extremely mixed in regards to SP1, so I’m afraid to download its I’ve used MS merchandise too long to leap into them with glee. With MS, I use YGF testing (“you go first”).
WPF and Silverlight are great–except Adobe dominates that market space and Microsoft’s entry I suspect will be the similar to that of FrontPage competing with Adobe’s Dreamweaver, or in the Browser wars, where Internet Explorer keeps catching up to FireFox with every “new” freed
If you’re in a high-dollar surroundings that’s going to toss a ton of money your way for hardware, training, and in addition has the cash to invest in a user base long serviced rather with outstanding success by Adobe. A user base that MS is hoping will jump to a new supplying of “Me Too” products, you’ll probably scoot happily right along . If you operate on a budget, as I do, I’d download the trial copy and give it a full 30 days of free used I didn’t do that this time, and I regret it is
Two stars are for the bugs that formulated an early (scary) SP1 release, my new sidekick–the blue donut, the apparent need to invest another thousand dollars on a sleek 64-bit machine, and the new tomes that I have to purchase and read. I’m become weiry of doing that when experience has shown, more times than not, there no great epiphany at the end of the MS upgrade tunnel.
I look forward to constructing with the new ribbon look in VC++, and in addition utilizing the other refinements to VSTO. So far the compatibility with the 64K development is above satisfactory; I have had no difficulties converting x86 to 64K applications. The only deficiency I have experienced is the price with the lack of a frequent version (I missed the fixed edition upgrade from 2008 standard).
For C++ programmers, Visual Studio 2005 was the best development tool.
Microsoft is always shrinking C++ feature set. VS 2005 had datasets, and
.NET Web Service Integration. VS 2008 scrapped those features.
VS 2010 is the primary Visual Studio to not include Intellicense in .NET (only
native).
Visual Studio is hands down the best integrated development environment for producing apps for windows and other platforms. That’s why I rate this product 5 stars.
The only negatives I’ve had is a lack of major improvements (could be good or bad), and I like the older 2008/2005 user interface. I as well wish there was as much aid for native C++ code as well as managed.















